Date: 2005-03-01 01:42 pm (UTC)
Actually, the common law concept also destroys the "sactity of marriage" if you want to get down to it. But, nevertheless, this is allowed.

But, yes, it's about gender discrimination--or, more specifically, fear and ignorance. But, then, that's the basis for all types of discrimination and prejudice.

Would love to see the ERA get passed; it'd make this entire issue disappear legally...but I'm not getting my hopes up. Still, it's been ratified by 35/38 required states. Gets closer every year. It's taken since 1923, but... (If we're wondering: The 15 states that have not ratified the ERA are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, and Virginia. Not shocked by that...)

I'll ignore the "conservative" push for a "defense of marriage" amendment entirely.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

collacentaur: (Default)
collacentaur

May 2011

S M T W T F S
1234567
89 10 1112 1314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 26th, 2025 07:53 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios